This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
A fact from Abdul Ghani Azhari appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 March 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that Abdul Ghani Azhari wrote Qadim Tarikh-e-Gujjar in Urdu, detailing the ancient history of Gujjars in India?
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Although I feel we should have an article about this book, I have not got that much time right now to write about the book. Please also let me know if this is a general question or are you reviewing the DYK nomination? ─ The Aafī on Mobile(talk) 18:41, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Overall: @TheAafi: To be honest, I don't think the hook is that interesting. Could another be proposed? Onegreatjoke (talk) 16:05, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Onegreatjoke, Thanks for the review. What do you think about the following hook? I would be happy if you can make some changes to the hook with regards to style and grammar. ─ The Aafī(talk) 16:30, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@TheAafi: Truthfully, I don't think that these are that interesting either. Maybe i'm not seeing it but I don't find these all that interesting. Onegreatjoke (talk) 18:19, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Onegreatjoke:, Alt1a appears pretty much interesting and hooky to me and perhaps you are not getting it because this belongs to a subject where you don't contribute. It is okay and you can leave the nomination to be reviewed once again by someone else who knows the subjective stuff perhaps. ─ The Aafī(talk) 00:20, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Another reviewer is requested to take a look at this. Gazal world would you likely be available to re-review this nomination? ─ The Aafī(talk) 00:36, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
New enough, long enough, neutrally written, well referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. ALT0 is interesting; hook ref verified and cited inline. QPQ done. ALT0 good to go. --Gazal world (talk) 17:28, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]