User talk:Keivan.f

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

It is 7:03 PM where this user lives. (Purge)

July 2024 Tatler issue[edit]

@Keivan.f Do you think the recent stir surrounding Catherine's portrait in Tatler's July 2024 issue deserves a mention on Wikipedia? Editors from reputable sources such as The Daily Telegraph, The Guardian, BBC News, and The Times have already criticised it in their articles. Looking forward to your opinion. Regards MSincccc (talk) 16:32, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No it does not. It is the archetypal example of WP:NOTNEWS. Catherine did not even sit for that portrait. Keivan.fTalk 16:34, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Keivan.f Could it be added to the article Fashion of Catherine, Princess of Wales given the magazine and the portrait itself focuses on that aspect of hers? Looking forward to your response. Regards MSincccc (talk) 16:36, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I fail to see how it relates to her fashion. It depicts her in a gown she wore to a state banquet in November 2022, but that's pretty much it. This was an "unofficial" portrait published by a magazine who had previously put "unofficial" portraits of Queen Elizabeth and King Charles on its cover as well (source: 1). The fact of the matter is, Catherine is absent from the public sphere and the journalists who make money off her have to latch onto the tiniest little things about her at the moment to keep themselves afloat. As I've said, this has no long-term significance. Keivan.fTalk 16:49, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Keivan.f Well, when are we proceeding with Catherine's FAC? Regards MSincccc (talk) 16:50, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Whenever other uninvolved editors start to leave comments on the nomination page. Frankly, it's out of my control. These things do not always proceed quickly and some patience is required. Keivan.fTalk 17:02, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Keivan.f User 750h+ left comments on the FAC yesterday, which I have addressed. However, he will only extend his full support for the nomination once other experienced editors have done so. I have pinged a few of them, as you can see on the FAC discussion page and on some of their talk pages. Given that you are a co-nominator, I hope you will also actively collaborate on the FAC. Looking forward to your response. Regards. MSincccc (talk) 05:35, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I have my eyes on it and I'm aware of the progress. You have addressed the editor's comments which is good. I'll be waiting for the next batch of comments and we'll go from there. Keivan.fTalk 16:58, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Keivan.f Gerda Arendt will be leaving comments once our turn arrives, as she is already very busy here on Wikipedia. Additionally, user Sohom Datta has assured me that they will do so within the next two days. Mike Christie is currently busy and unable to help until June, when he will assist if the nomination is still open for discussion. I look forward to hearing your thoughts on this. Regards. MSincccc (talk) 17:29, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's good. That should be enough feedback for an FAC. We'll be waiting for their comments then. Keivan.fTalk 20:44, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Aishwarya Rai Bachchan[edit]

On 31 May 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Aishwarya Rai Bachchan, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Aishwarya Rai Bachchan (pictured) was the first Indian actress to be a juror at the Cannes Film Festival? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Aishwarya Rai Bachchan. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Aishwarya Rai Bachchan), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 00:02, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]