User talk:M Waleed

Battle of Bahadur post moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Battle of Bahadur post. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 07:14, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It might be a good idea to create articles in the drafts namespace first and then submit them for review. @AfghanParatrooper19891: Can you also take a look at this article to see if there's anything off about it? —Saqib (talk I contribs) 07:17, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, check it , there's ten sources and I think it's enough to be moved back Waleed (talk) 08:08, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aside from some grammatical issues, there is nothing wrong with the article. I think it simply requires copyediting. AfghanParatrooper19891 (talk) 10:25, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Saqib, review the page now brother and shift it back, moreover I'm unable to submit the draft on my device as it's facing a glitch so if you can't shift it back then submit it for review Waleed (talk) 14:00, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, I don't see it passing WP:N. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 15:47, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Saqib, reason? There are battles with way smaller tolls and this one was a major one in the conflict Waleed (talk) 15:55, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Saqib, brother Battle of Tiger Hill, Battle of Tololing and Battle of Point 4875 between Pakistan and India have smaller casualties. This was the only shootdown of Pakistani aircraft in siachen. This was battle in which the largest casualties of officers occurred in siachen. This brought Pakistan to accept indian demands. What reason you present for non notability. Waleed (talk) 16:12, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of sig/in-depth coverage. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 16:14, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Saqib brother,See the articles I've mentioned and their length about the battles. Waleed (talk) 16:16, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Saqib, now brother and also see my previous reply Waleed (talk) 10:17, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please feel free to submit it for review if you think it's ready. However, I may not pass it because I don't feel it's ready yet. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 10:19, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just a friendly reminder. Let's just keep the 'brothers' and 'sisters' out of our discussions. Thanks! —Saqib (talk I contribs) 10:22, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Saqib, if you don't like I wouldn't use such terms for you even though I believe in mutual brotherhood and about the article, I think it's enough and you can see precedents in other articles of battles that I gave Waleed (talk) 11:35, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Tololing, for example has a singular paragraph whereas I've given like 4 paragraphs Waleed (talk) 11:36, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Saqib, please respond to the precedent I gave so that I can proceed Waleed (talk) 16:41, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Battle of Bahadur post has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Battle of Bahadur post. Thanks! —Saqib (talk I contribs) 19:50, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because Pakistan is known to censor information on topics that could be a shame for Pak military, another thing like this is PC Pak Search Sudhan Operation which has been highly censored in Pakistan along with a lot of info on Bangladeshi genocide Waleed (talk) 03:24, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Saqib Waleed (talk) 03:24, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with your reasoning. I couldn't find even a single mention of this battle in Pakistani newspapers. Also please see notability guideline on events:WP:NEVENTS. The guideline suggests that not every battle necessitates an article; if there isn't adequate coverage available, it might be best to leave it. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 16:19, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1986 Miran Shah incident (June 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Saqib was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of events). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:GNG as well WP:NEVENTS which says an event is presumed to be notable if it has lasting major consequences!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:1986 Miran Shah incident and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—Saqib (talk I contribs) 16:10, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, M Waleed! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —Saqib (talk I contribs) 16:10, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]