The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PrimalMustelidtalk 14:37, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Overall: Article is new and long enough according to DYK Check, Earwig turns out fine and cited (I added duplication for the citation behind one sentence just to be safe). QPQ honestly not needed since you have less than 5 nom but you provided anyway so neat. Im on the edge whether this is interesting enough or not, but I think its good enough so good to go Nyanardsan (talk) 12:42, 16 April 2024 (UTC)