User talk:Keivan.f

This is Keivan.f's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10: 31 days

Welcome to Keivan.f's talk page. I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your talk page (or the article's talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to watch this page until you are responded to, or let me know where specifically you'd prefer the reply. I will try to WP:PING you as well. Conversely if you are replying to something I've said on another talk page, reply there and include {{ping|Keivan.f}} to alert me.

Please don't template me! Everybody makes mistakes, and this user finds user warning templates impersonal and disrespectful. If there's something you'd like to say, please take a moment to write a comment below in your own words.

It is 12:48 PM where this user lives. ^(Purge)

Wisdom[edit]

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia not a pop culture magazine. User Nford24 attributes this quote to you among his "Wikiwisdom" quotes. It seems that you have been inspiring him just as you have been inspiring me. I look forward to progressing with Catherine's FAC and hope you are doing well. Regards, and have a great day ahead. MSincccc (talk) 09:09, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message. I'm glad User Nford24 has found my comment interesting. We'll see how the FAC goes; hopefully in the right direction! Best. Keivan.f^Talk 18:31, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Keivan.f Catherine's article has an alarmingly high EARWIG score of 99.1%. However, it appears that the source concerned is quoting exactly the same information as her Wikipedia article. How can this issue be resolved? Looking forward to your response. Regards. MSincccc (talk) 07:43, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I had discussed the matter with User:Diannaa here. That website is a mirror of Wikipedia and needs to come out to get a proper score, which is in fact much lower. Keivan.f^Talk 12:44, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Keivan.f But the concerned article-which is a mirror of Catherine's Wikipedia article-does not appear in the current revision of the article. Looking forward to your response. Regards. MSincccc (talk) 13:32, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't necessarily have to be cited within the article for the bot to compare the page against it. Keivan.f^Talk 17:48, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]